The case for allowing this kind of development is straightforward: construction jobs, an expanded property tax base and, if the facility hires locally, longer-term employment. The case against centres on strain, on the electrical grid, on skilled trades already stretched by other construction, and on housing demand if the project brings workers into the city faster than new supply can absorb them.
That last point is the one Saskatoon's own numbers speak to directly. A market already sitting at 1.63 months of supply has little room to absorb a sudden jump in housing demand from a large new employer before new construction can catch up.
Joel Dyck watches supply figures like this closely because they are the clearest sign of how much room the market actually has to absorb a big change. Get your hand-reviewed valuation from Joel Dyck.